Back to Tracer Agenda
TR-03completeEmergency

Patient MG-4445, 73F — femoral neck fracture with delirium and falls risk

18 of 18 points observed

Individual patient tracer — acute medical admission · Ravi Shanmugam

Surveyor Tracer Final Report

Official Joint Commission International accreditation tracer summary

Patient MG-4445, 73F — femoral neck fracture with delirium and falls risk

Individual patient tracer — acute medical admission · Emergency

Point Compliance
75%
16 checkpoints scored
Findings Raised
0
Actionable deficit citations
Surveyor Sign-off
Ravi Shanmugam
Attested 2026-09-16

Chapter Compliance Telemetry

Standard adherence computed across all observed checkpoints for this trace

  • SQE1 checkpoint
    1 gap0%
  • MOI1 checkpoint
    1 gap0%
  • AOP2 checkpoints
    1 gap25%
  • COP1 checkpoint
    Clean50%
  • ACC4 checkpoints
    1 gap63%
  • MMU2 checkpoints
    Clean75%
  • IPSG6 checkpoints
    Clean83%
  • FMS1 checkpoint
    Clean100%
  • ASC2 checkpoints
    Clean100%
  • PCI1 checkpoint
    Clean100%
  • QPS1 checkpoint
    Clean100%
These scores automatically roll up into the institutional Readiness MatrixReadiness matrix

What you have recorded

18 of 18 points
  1. Arrival

    Access and acceptance

    Compliant

    Asked two members of staff independently; both described the same process and located the evidence.

    Emergency·4 of 10 records compliant·described·
    ACC
    ·1 evidence artifact
  2. Arrival

    Two-identifier verification

    Compliant

    Staff demonstrated the step without prompting and produced the record on request.

    Emergency·6 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    IPSG
    ·1 evidence artifact
  3. Triage

    Acuity assignment and reassessment

    Partial

    Practice was correct where observed, though staff could not locate the governing document on the unit.

    Emergency·6 of 10 records compliant·described·
    AOPACC
    ·1 evidence artifact
  4. Triage

    Falls risk screening

    Partial

    Two of the sample met the standard in full; the remainder were missing a timed signature.

    Emergency·10 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    IPSG
    ·1 evidence artifact
  5. Initial assessment

    Timeliness and qualification

    Non-compliant

    Neither the practice nor the record met the standard in the sample reviewed.

    Emergency·8 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    AOPSQE
    ·1 evidence artifact
  6. Initial assessment

    Consent and privacy

    Not applicable

    No patients meeting the criterion were present during the trace.

    Emergency·
    PFR
    ·1 evidence artifact
  7. Diagnostics

    Critical result communication

    Compliant

    Asked two members of staff independently; both described the same process and located the evidence.

    Radiology·8 of 10 records compliant·described·
    IPSG
    ·1 evidence artifact
  8. Diagnostics

    Imaging equipment status

    Compliant

    Staff demonstrated the step without prompting and produced the record on request.

    Radiology·5 of 10 records compliant·described·
    FMS
    ·2 evidence artifacts
  9. Intervention

    Time-out and site verification

    Compliant

    Practice at the bedside matched the written process; the record was complete and timed.

    Operating Theatres·5 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    IPSGASC
    ·1 evidence artifact
  10. Intervention

    Anaesthesia assessment and monitoring

    Compliant

    Asked two members of staff independently; both described the same process and located the evidence.

    Operating Theatres·5 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    ASC
    ·1 evidence artifact
  11. Care unit

    High-alert medication storage

    Compliant

    Staff demonstrated the step without prompting and produced the record on request.

    ICU·4 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    IPSGMMU
    ·3 evidence artifacts
  12. Care unit

    Line care and hand hygiene

    Compliant

    Practice at the bedside matched the written process; the record was complete and timed.

    ICU·8 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    PCI
    ·2 evidence artifacts
  13. Handover

    Structured handover

    Partial

    Two of the sample met the standard in full; the remainder were missing a timed signature.

    ICU·4 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    IPSGCOP
    ·1 evidence artifact
  14. Handover

    Medication reconciliation at transfer

    Partial

    Process is understood and mostly followed, but the record is incomplete for part of the period reviewed.

    ICU·7 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    MMU
    ·1 evidence artifact
  15. Discharge

    Discharge summary completeness

    Non-compliant

    Staff described the correct process but could not demonstrate it, and no record exists for the period.

    Outpatients·4 of 10 records compliant·described·
    ACCMOI
    ·1 evidence artifact
  16. Discharge

    Patient and family education

    Not applicable

    No patients meeting the criterion were present during the trace.

    Outpatients·
    PFE
    ·1 evidence artifact
  17. Follow-up

    Continuity of care

    Compliant

    Staff demonstrated the step without prompting and produced the record on request.

    Outpatients·4 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    ACC
    ·1 evidence artifact
  18. Follow-up

    Outcome data capture

    Compliant

    Practice at the bedside matched the written process; the record was complete and timed.

    Outpatients·8 of 10 records compliant·described·
    QPS
    ·1 evidence artifact

Machine-generated observation. Every item requires human review and sign-off before it is acted on.

Demonstration output from synthetic data. This is decision support for your quality team, not an accreditation determination.