Back to Tracer Agenda
TR-11completeInfection Prevention

System — Prevention and control of infection

12 of 12 points observed

System tracer — prevention and control of infection · Dr. Tomas Lindqvist

Surveyor Tracer Final Report

Official Joint Commission International accreditation tracer summary

System — Prevention and control of infection

System tracer — prevention and control of infection · Infection Prevention

Point Compliance
82%
11 checkpoints scored
Findings Raised
0
Actionable deficit citations
Surveyor Sign-off
Dr. Tomas Lindqvist
Attested 2026-09-15

Chapter Compliance Telemetry

Standard adherence computed across all observed checkpoints for this trace

  • FMS1 checkpoint
    Clean50%
  • PCI8 checkpoints
    1 gap75%
  • QPS4 checkpoints
    1 gap75%
  • GLD3 checkpoints
    Clean100%
  • MOI1 checkpoint
    Clean100%
  • SQE2 checkpoints
    Clean100%
These scores automatically roll up into the institutional Readiness MatrixReadiness matrix

What you have recorded

12 of 12 points
  1. Governance

    Programme ownership and authority

    Compliant

    Practice at the bedside matched the written process; the record was complete and timed.

    Infection Prevention·5 of 10 records compliant·described·
    GLDPCI
    ·1 evidence artifact
  2. Governance

    Resourcing the programme

    Compliant

    Asked two members of staff independently; both described the same process and located the evidence.

    Infection Prevention·9 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    GLD
    ·1 evidence artifact
  3. Process design

    Risk assessment and priorities

    Compliant

    Staff demonstrated the step without prompting and produced the record on request.

    Infection Prevention·9 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    PCIQPS
    ·1 evidence artifact
  4. Process design

    Guideline currency

    Compliant

    Practice at the bedside matched the written process; the record was complete and timed.

    Infection Prevention·5 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    PCIMOI
    ·1 evidence artifact
  5. Staff competence

    Orientation and ongoing education

    Compliant

    Asked two members of staff independently; both described the same process and located the evidence.

    HR·10 of 10 records compliant·described·
    SQEPCI
    ·1 evidence artifact
  6. Staff competence

    Demonstrated competence

    Compliant

    Staff demonstrated the step without prompting and produced the record on request.

    HR·5 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    SQE
    ·1 evidence artifact
  7. Environment

    Sterilisation and reprocessing

    Partial

    Practice was correct where observed, though staff could not locate the governing document on the unit.

    Infection Prevention·7 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    PCI
    ·2 evidence artifacts
  8. Environment

    Ventilation and isolation

    Partial

    Two of the sample met the standard in full; the remainder were missing a timed signature.

    Infection Prevention·5 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    PCIFMS
    ·3 evidence artifacts
  9. Monitoring and data

    Surveillance and definitions

    Non-compliant

    Neither the practice nor the record met the standard in the sample reviewed.

    Quality·10 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    PCIQPS
    ·1 evidence artifact
  10. Monitoring and data

    Data validation

    Not applicable

    No patients meeting the criterion were present during the trace.

    Quality·
    QPSMOI
    ·1 evidence artifact
  11. Improvement loop

    Action taken on the data

    Compliant

    Asked two members of staff independently; both described the same process and located the evidence.

    Quality·5 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    QPSPCI
    ·1 evidence artifact
  12. Improvement loop

    Reporting to staff and leadership

    Compliant

    Staff demonstrated the step without prompting and produced the record on request.

    Quality·10 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    GLDQPS
    ·1 evidence artifact

Machine-generated observation. Every item requires human review and sign-off before it is acted on.

Demonstration output from synthetic data. This is decision support for your quality team, not an accreditation determination.