Back to Tracer Agenda
TR-01completeEmergency

Patient MG-4400, 50M — community-acquired pneumonia with septic shock

18 of 18 points observed

Individual patient tracer — acute medical admission · Dr. Miriam Haddad

Surveyor Tracer Final Report

Official Joint Commission International accreditation tracer summary

Patient MG-4400, 50M — community-acquired pneumonia with septic shock

Individual patient tracer — acute medical admission · Emergency

Point Compliance
82%
17 checkpoints scored
Findings Raised
1
Actionable deficit citations
Surveyor Sign-off
Dr. Miriam Haddad
Attested 2026-09-14

Chapter Compliance Telemetry

Standard adherence computed across all observed checkpoints for this trace

  • ASC1 checkpoint
    1 gap0%
  • FMS1 checkpoint
    Clean50%
  • QPS1 checkpoint
    Clean50%
  • IPSG6 checkpoints
    1 gap75%
  • ACC4 checkpoints
    Clean88%
  • AOP2 checkpoints
    Clean100%
  • SQE1 checkpoint
    Clean100%
  • PFR1 checkpoint
    Clean100%
  • MMU2 checkpoints
    Clean100%
  • PCI1 checkpoint
    Clean100%
  • COP1 checkpoint
    Clean100%
  • MOI1 checkpoint
    Clean100%
  • PFE1 checkpoint
    Clean100%
These scores automatically roll up into the institutional Readiness MatrixReadiness matrix

Findings Raised During Trace (1)

  • medium
    Evidence gap identified for IPSG.2 during mock surveyor; requires documented remediation. (demonstration)
    Dr. Lucas Dubois · Due 24 Oct 2026

What you have recorded

18 of 18 points
  1. Arrival

    Access and acceptance

    Compliant

    Staff demonstrated the step without prompting and produced the record on request.

    Emergency·5 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    ACC
    ·1 evidence artifact
  2. Arrival

    Two-identifier verification

    Compliant

    Practice at the bedside matched the written process; the record was complete and timed.

    Emergency·4 of 10 records compliant·described·
    IPSG
    ·1 evidence artifact
  3. Triage

    Acuity assignment and reassessment

    Compliant

    Asked two members of staff independently; both described the same process and located the evidence.

    Emergency·5 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    AOPACC
    ·1 evidence artifact
  4. Triage

    Falls risk screening

    Compliant

    Staff demonstrated the step without prompting and produced the record on request.

    Emergency·5 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    IPSG
    ·1 evidence artifact
  5. Initial assessment

    Timeliness and qualification

    Compliant

    Practice at the bedside matched the written process; the record was complete and timed.

    Emergency·5 of 10 records compliant·described·
    AOPSQE
    ·1 evidence artifact
  6. Initial assessment

    Consent and privacy

    Compliant

    Asked two members of staff independently; both described the same process and located the evidence.

    Emergency·4 of 10 records compliant·described·
    PFR
    ·1 evidence artifact
  7. Diagnostics

    Critical result communication

    Partial

    Process is understood and mostly followed, but the record is incomplete for part of the period reviewed.

    Radiology·10 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    IPSG
    ·1 evidence artifact
  8. Diagnostics

    Imaging equipment status

    Partial

    Practice was correct where observed, though staff could not locate the governing document on the unit.

    Radiology·7 of 10 records compliant·described·
    FMS
    ·2 evidence artifacts
  9. Intervention

    Time-out and site verification

    Non-compliant

    The evidence produced contradicts the written process for this unit.

    Operating Theatres·4 of 10 records compliant·described·
    IPSGASC
    ·1 evidence artifact
  10. Intervention

    Anaesthesia assessment and monitoring

    Not applicable

    No patients meeting the criterion were present during the trace.

    Operating Theatres·
    ASC
    ·1 evidence artifact
  11. Care unit

    High-alert medication storage

    Compliant

    Practice at the bedside matched the written process; the record was complete and timed.

    ICU·4 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    IPSGMMU
    ·3 evidence artifacts
  12. Care unit

    Line care and hand hygiene

    Compliant

    Asked two members of staff independently; both described the same process and located the evidence.

    ICU·4 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    PCI
    ·2 evidence artifacts
  13. Handover

    Structured handover

    Compliant

    Staff demonstrated the step without prompting and produced the record on request.

    ICU·9 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    IPSGCOP
    ·1 evidence artifact
  14. Handover

    Medication reconciliation at transfer

    Compliant

    Practice at the bedside matched the written process; the record was complete and timed.

    ICU·10 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    MMU
    ·1 evidence artifact
  15. Discharge

    Discharge summary completeness

    Compliant

    Asked two members of staff independently; both described the same process and located the evidence.

    Outpatients·5 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    ACCMOI
    ·1 evidence artifact
  16. Discharge

    Patient and family education

    Compliant

    Staff demonstrated the step without prompting and produced the record on request.

    Outpatients·8 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    PFE
    ·1 evidence artifact
  17. Follow-up

    Continuity of care

    Partial

    Practice was correct where observed, though staff could not locate the governing document on the unit.

    Outpatients·9 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    ACC
    ·1 evidence artifact
  18. Follow-up

    Outcome data capture

    Partial

    Two of the sample met the standard in full; the remainder were missing a timed signature.

    Outpatients·7 of 10 records compliant·demonstrated·
    QPS
    ·1 evidence artifact

Machine-generated observation. Every item requires human review and sign-off before it is acted on.

Demonstration output from synthetic data. This is decision support for your quality team, not an accreditation determination.